Saturday, September 23, 2017

     Young Children and Research

     Research involving children could prove to be quite an adventure particularly in the school setting. Children can be unpredictable, especially young children. Many years ago my Head Start agency would allow school psychology majors to work in the classrooms to observe, implement behavioral interventions, and collect general data on the experiences of children ages 3-5.  One of the many items they collected research on was letter fluency and number fluency.  They had a very prescribed way of administering the fluency tests from which they could not deviate.  If you have ever administered fluency tests of any sort to a three year old, you can imagine how well this went on occasion. For the most part, the children were cooperative and really tried to perform well.  I was highly entertained when a child who was clearly wanting to do something besides this fluency test would derail the testing by talking, rolling around in the chair, refusing to speak, laughing or performing any other number of avoidance techniques.  I would often intervene and insist that the child be released and tested later.  Most of the time, the children were just avoiding this task by entertaining themselves, but occasionally, I would find one under genuine stress because they knew they were producing incorrect answers.  These children were certainly in no danger physically or emotionally, but the process was fun to watch. Children are going to do whatever children want to do! Often, I would administer the fluency tests myself once the student was gone; the children always did better with someone they knew.

                                            Image result for children misbehaving

      So what were the benefits of this stringent yet entertaining research?  We were the low-income preschool environment with higher risk children. Our children were healthy, cared for, and heavily monitored but certainly had some disadvantages in life. There was another test group in a higher income childcare/preschool facility with significantly less rigorous academic standards than Head Start. None-the-less, our children scored much lower on a consistent basis.  This was one of many studies that supports the importance of high-quality early childhood education to bridge the knowledge gap that exists across income levels. Regardless of the academic exposure, nurturing school environment, and 6 hours a day in a safe learning environment, our children still had deficits not seen in higher-income children. I would argue, however, that this research focused on an extremely narrow area of development (letter and number fluency). Luckily, this was internal data that was used solely by the university students and was not published.

                                        Image result for letter fluency test

     This school year, we are venturing into another research project with the University of Cincinnati called First Steps Next. The goal of this research is to prove that a twenty day intensive behavioral modification technique involving whole class instruction that promotes pro-social behaviors in a target child while also incorporating visual cues for said child will reverse negative behaviors. The theory is that with an intense enough intervention delivered in a systematic and consistent manner will quickly reverse behavioral habits in a child with extreme behaviors.  This program is not meant to teach children why they need to act in a pro social manner. This program is meant to only bring the child to a level where they can be taught the reasons and benefits of pro-social behaviors. Let's face it: we do occasionally encounter that child that is resistant to the best of our techniques. It's difficult to work with a child when they are running in circles or throwing chairs. This program is meant to decrease these behaviors to allow the target child to function in a productive way. We will begin First Step Next at the beginning of October. I'll let you all know how it goes! This program has been around for 20 plus years but is gaining steam across the United States. I have included a webinar link below. If it works, we will incorporate this technique on an on-going basis outside of the research group.



                                                FIRST STEP Next contains everything a coach needs to implement the program.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SupK3sIIQs


References

Pacific Northwest Publishers. (2016). First Step Next webinar. Retrieved                                                      from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SupK3sIIQs







4 comments:

  1. Hello Rebecca,
    You did a marvelous job on your blog posting this week. It is wonderful that you have been involved in several research projects in your program. I valued your statement "Often, I would administer the fluency tests myself once the student was gone; the children always did better with someone they knew." You are so right even when a specialist comes in to work with one of my students they do better if my coworker or I are present. Have a delightful week!
    Tammy

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Rebecca
    I thank you for sharing your experience with us. I really enjoyed your description of what was taking place during those screenings, and could not help but smile while envisioning this experience. This has been my dilemma as a head start teacher in the school setting, all of our screenings are done with a set of retired teachers who administer these test. The problem with this is that the children are often shy, or afraid because they are usually meeting these individuals for the very first time; additionally my class is comprised of several dual-language learners, however, there are no bilingual screeners. This often skews the data, on several occasions many of these children have been labeled as delayed in areas of language/cognition which is a false assessment. These poor children in addition to meeting the screener for the very first time, are pulled out to another area and expected to perform.
    I look forward to learning about the results of this new study your program is undertaking.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi!
    I really appreciate that your observations of your kids getting tested was from such a compassionate perspective. You saw the testers pushing something and you observed the children naturally reacting in their own way.
    The whole idea of testing reminds me of a lovely story I once heard-
    "Imagine for a moment that you are visiting a plant nursery. You hear a commotion outside, so you investigate. You find a young assistant struggling with a rose bush - he is trying to force open the petals of a rose, and muttering in frustration. You ask him what he is doing, and he explains, "My boss wants all these roses to bloom this week, so last week I taped all the early ones, and now I'm opening the late ones." You protest that every rose has it's own schedule of blooming; it is absurd to try to slow down or speed this up; it doesn't matter when roses bloom; a rose will always bloom at its own best time."

    You know where she's going, right?

    Children are no different than roses in their development: they are born with the capacity and desire to learn, they learn at different rates, and they learn in different ways. If we can meet their needs, provide a safe, nurturing environment, and keep from interfering with our doubts, anxieties, and arbitrary timetables, then - like roses - they will all bloom at their own best time.

    I believe. This is my perspective, my deep truth. I know it's not a popular belief with the system of schooling. What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hello Rebecca,
    Great Blog! I agree with your Blog children can be uncomfortable with strangers and uncommon situations. All situations can alter a child's test scoring but as a teacher what can we do to help? A teacher is able to comfort and teach the skills necessary for that level of development.
    Melodi Cashio

    ReplyDelete